rjmccall added a comment. Are you sure these are the right semantics for `nodestroy`? I think there's a reasonable argument that we should not destroy previous elements of a `nodestroy` array just because an element constructor throws. It's basically academic for true globals because the exception will terminate the process anyway, and even for `thread_local`s and `static` locals (where I believe the exception is theoretically recoverable) it's at least arguable that we should either decline to destroy (possibly causing leaks) or simply call `std::terminate`.
Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
