tstellar added a comment. > ! In D61804#1499999 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61804#1499999>, @beanz wrote: > I apologize that I missed your thread on the dev list, because that would > have been a much better place to have this conversation. Having gone back and > read it now, it sounds to me like what you really want is a clang equivalent > of libLLVM. That is a reasonable and viable thing to want. This patch > (https://reviews.llvm.org/P8147) is a first stab. I'm happy to prepare that > for landing in Clang if that meets your needs, and that is a viable way > forward.
I think this patch is missing the new clang-shlib directory. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61804/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61804 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
