rsmith added a subscriber: alexr. rsmith added a comment. Generally, I think this is a good, useful feature, but there's one point from http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html 's checklist for accepting language extensions on which its case is weak, as reflected by this feedback from @alexr on D17741 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D17741>:
> I don't think we want to add a fundamental new preprocessor feature like > `__FILE_BASENAME__` without at least getting some early buy-in from the WG14 > and WG21 committees. Specifically: have you suggested this feature on the WG14 or WG21 mailing lists? I'm not especially opposed to carrying this feature as a Clang extension, but from http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html, "Clang should drive the standard, not diverge from it", and we should at least try to push for standardizing this if we think it's worthwhile as an alternative to `__FILE__`. Failing that, have you asked the GCC developers whether they'd be amenable to providing this functionality? Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61756/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61756 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
