gribozavr added a comment. > I prefer Option 2 because it is a cleaner, more understandable design for the > matchers.
I agree with Aaron. Clang or Clang Tooling provide no promise of source stability. Of course we should not break things just because we can, but API coherence and maintainability of Clang Tooling code are good reasons. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60543/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60543 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
