winksaville added a comment. In D62279#1514596 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62279#1514596>, @beanz wrote:
> @winksaville I've figured out how to resolve the `gtest` issue, but > unfortunately that isn't good enough to get the `check-runtimes` target > working. A change went in back in February (rL353601 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/rL353601>), which breaks running compiler-rt's > tests when building a distribution in non-trivial ways, which will > unfortunately be difficult to resolve. > > I will land the `gtest` fix sometime today, and I'm going to start working > toward getting the larger issue resolved, although that is going to take some > time. @beanz, glad we're making progress! One other thing, my next goal, after we can successfully build and test the `DistributionExample`, is to make `DistributionExample_shared`. I envision this creating `clang` that is dynamically linked to `libclang_shared.so` and `libLLVM.so` and also provide the corresponding static libraries. Doing this should provide Evangelos Foutras, whose is the maintainer of the llvm packages at Arch Linux, an "easier" path to creating llvm Arch Linux packages that don't use BUILD_SHARED_LIBS. Is this a reasonable goal and could `DistrubutionExample_shared` be added along side `DistributionExample`? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62279/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
