Thanks! Re-landed in r362924.

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:15 PM Vlad Tsyrklevich via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> This change caused LSan failures and has been reverted in r362830:
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/32809
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:42 AM Sam McCall via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: sammccall
>> Date: Fri Jun  7 02:45:17 2019
>> New Revision: 362785
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=362785&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [CodeComplete] Improve overload handling for C++ qualified and
>> ref-qualified methods.
>>
>> Summary:
>> - when a method is not available because of the target value kind (e.g.
>> an &&
>>   method on a Foo& variable), then don't offer it.
>> - when a method is effectively shadowed by another method from the same
>> class
>>   with a) an identical argument list and b) superior qualifiers, then
>> don't
>>   offer it.
>>
>> Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
>>
>> Subscribers: cfe-commits
>>
>> Tags: #clang
>>
>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62582
>>
>> Modified:
>>     cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
>>     cfe/trunk/test/CodeCompletion/member-access.cpp
>>
>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
>> URL:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp?rev=362785&r1=362784&r2=362785&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp (original)
>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp Fri Jun  7 02:45:17 2019
>> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@
>>  #include "clang/AST/ExprCXX.h"
>>  #include "clang/AST/ExprObjC.h"
>>  #include "clang/AST/QualTypeNames.h"
>> +#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
>>  #include "clang/Basic/CharInfo.h"
>> +#include "clang/Basic/Specifiers.h"
>>  #include "clang/Lex/HeaderSearch.h"
>>  #include "clang/Lex/MacroInfo.h"
>>  #include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
>> @@ -152,9 +154,16 @@ private:
>>    /// different levels of, e.g., the inheritance hierarchy.
>>    std::list<ShadowMap> ShadowMaps;
>>
>> +  /// Overloaded C++ member functions found by SemaLookup.
>> +  /// Used to determine when one overload is dominated by another.
>> +  llvm::DenseMap<std::pair<DeclContext *, /*Name*/uintptr_t>,
>> ShadowMapEntry>
>> +      OverloadMap;
>> +
>>    /// If we're potentially referring to a C++ member function, the set
>>    /// of qualifiers applied to the object type.
>>    Qualifiers ObjectTypeQualifiers;
>> +  /// The kind of the object expression, for rvalue/lvalue overloads.
>> +  ExprValueKind ObjectKind;
>>
>>    /// Whether the \p ObjectTypeQualifiers field is active.
>>    bool HasObjectTypeQualifiers;
>> @@ -230,8 +239,9 @@ public:
>>    /// out member functions that aren't available (because there will be a
>>    /// cv-qualifier mismatch) or prefer functions with an exact qualifier
>>    /// match.
>> -  void setObjectTypeQualifiers(Qualifiers Quals) {
>> +  void setObjectTypeQualifiers(Qualifiers Quals, ExprValueKind Kind) {
>>      ObjectTypeQualifiers = Quals;
>> +    ObjectKind = Kind;
>>      HasObjectTypeQualifiers = true;
>>    }
>>
>> @@ -1157,6 +1167,53 @@ static void setInBaseClass(ResultBuilder
>>    R.InBaseClass = true;
>>  }
>>
>> +enum class OverloadCompare { BothViable, Dominates, Dominated };
>> +// Will Candidate ever be called on the object, when overloaded with
>> Incumbent?
>> +// Returns Dominates if Candidate is always called, Dominated if
>> Incumbent is
>> +// always called, BothViable if either may be called dependending on
>> arguments.
>> +// Precondition: must actually be overloads!
>> +static OverloadCompare compareOverloads(const CXXMethodDecl &Candidate,
>> +                                        const CXXMethodDecl &Incumbent,
>> +                                        const Qualifiers &ObjectQuals,
>> +                                        ExprValueKind ObjectKind) {
>> +  if (Candidate.isVariadic() != Incumbent.isVariadic() ||
>> +      Candidate.getNumParams() != Incumbent.getNumParams() ||
>> +      Candidate.getMinRequiredArguments() !=
>> +          Incumbent.getMinRequiredArguments())
>> +    return OverloadCompare::BothViable;
>> +  for (unsigned I = 0, E = Candidate.getNumParams(); I != E; ++I)
>> +    if (Candidate.parameters()[I]->getType().getCanonicalType() !=
>> +        Incumbent.parameters()[I]->getType().getCanonicalType())
>> +      return OverloadCompare::BothViable;
>> +  if (!llvm::empty(Candidate.specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>()) ||
>> +      !llvm::empty(Incumbent.specific_attrs<EnableIfAttr>()))
>> +    return OverloadCompare::BothViable;
>> +  // At this point, we know calls can't pick one or the other based on
>> +  // arguments, so one of the two must win. (Or both fail, handled
>> elsewhere).
>> +  RefQualifierKind CandidateRef = Candidate.getRefQualifier();
>> +  RefQualifierKind IncumbentRef = Incumbent.getRefQualifier();
>> +  if (CandidateRef != IncumbentRef) {
>> +    // If the object kind is LValue/RValue, there's one acceptable
>> ref-qualifier
>> +    // and it can't be mixed with ref-unqualified overloads (in valid
>> code).
>> +
>> +    // For xvalue objects, we prefer the rvalue overload even if we have
>> to
>> +    // add qualifiers (which is rare, because const&& is rare).
>> +    if (ObjectKind == clang::VK_XValue)
>> +      return CandidateRef == RQ_RValue ? OverloadCompare::Dominates
>> +                                       : OverloadCompare::Dominated;
>> +  }
>> +  // Now the ref qualifiers are the same (or we're in some invalid
>> state).
>> +  // So make some decision based on the qualifiers.
>> +  Qualifiers CandidateQual = Candidate.getMethodQualifiers();
>> +  Qualifiers IncumbentQual = Incumbent.getMethodQualifiers();
>> +  bool CandidateSuperset =
>> CandidateQual.compatiblyIncludes(IncumbentQual);
>> +  bool IncumbentSuperset =
>> IncumbentQual.compatiblyIncludes(CandidateQual);
>> +  if (CandidateSuperset == IncumbentSuperset)
>> +    return OverloadCompare::BothViable;
>> +  return IncumbentSuperset ? OverloadCompare::Dominates
>> +                           : OverloadCompare::Dominated;
>> +}
>> +
>>  void ResultBuilder::AddResult(Result R, DeclContext *CurContext,
>>                                NamedDecl *Hiding, bool InBaseClass =
>> false) {
>>    if (R.Kind != Result::RK_Declaration) {
>> @@ -1233,6 +1290,44 @@ void ResultBuilder::AddResult(Result R,
>>            // qualifiers.
>>            return;
>>          }
>> +        // Detect cases where a ref-qualified method cannot be invoked.
>> +        switch (Method->getRefQualifier()) {
>> +          case RQ_LValue:
>> +            if (ObjectKind != VK_LValue && !MethodQuals.hasConst())
>> +              return;
>> +            break;
>> +          case RQ_RValue:
>> +            if (ObjectKind == VK_LValue)
>> +              return;
>> +            break;
>> +          case RQ_None:
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        /// Check whether this dominates another overloaded method,
>> which should
>> +        /// be suppressed (or vice versa).
>> +        /// Motivating case is const_iterator begin() const vs iterator
>> begin().
>> +        auto &OverloadSet = OverloadMap[std::make_pair(
>> +            CurContext, Method->getDeclName().getAsOpaqueInteger())];
>> +        for (const DeclIndexPair& Entry : OverloadSet) {
>> +          Result &Incumbent = Results[Entry.second];
>> +          switch (compareOverloads(*Method,
>> +
>>  *cast<CXXMethodDecl>(Incumbent.Declaration),
>> +                                   ObjectTypeQualifiers, ObjectKind)) {
>> +          case OverloadCompare::Dominates:
>> +            // Replace the dominated overload with this one.
>> +            // FIXME: if the overload dominates multiple incumbents then
>> we
>> +            // should remove all. But two overloads is by far the common
>> case.
>> +            Incumbent = std::move(R);
>> +            return;
>> +          case OverloadCompare::Dominated:
>> +            // This overload can't be called, drop it.
>> +            return;
>> +          case OverloadCompare::BothViable:
>> +            break;
>> +          }
>> +        }
>> +        OverloadSet.Add(Method, Results.size());
>>        }
>>
>>    // Insert this result into the set of results.
>> @@ -3997,7 +4092,8 @@ void Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName(Scop
>>    // the member function to filter/prioritize the results list.
>>    auto ThisType = getCurrentThisType();
>>    if (!ThisType.isNull())
>> -
>> Results.setObjectTypeQualifiers(ThisType->getPointeeType().getQualifiers());
>> +
>> Results.setObjectTypeQualifiers(ThisType->getPointeeType().getQualifiers(),
>> +                                    VK_LValue);
>>
>>    CodeCompletionDeclConsumer Consumer(Results, CurContext);
>>    LookupVisibleDecls(S, LookupOrdinaryName, Consumer,
>> @@ -4551,13 +4647,12 @@ AddObjCProperties(const CodeCompletionCo
>>    }
>>  }
>>
>> -static void
>> -AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(Sema &SemaRef, ResultBuilder &Results,
>> -                                  Scope *S, QualType BaseType,
>> RecordDecl *RD,
>> -                                  Optional<FixItHint> AccessOpFixIt) {
>> +static void AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(
>> +    Sema &SemaRef, ResultBuilder &Results, Scope *S, QualType BaseType,
>> +    ExprValueKind BaseKind, RecordDecl *RD, Optional<FixItHint>
>> AccessOpFixIt) {
>>    // Indicate that we are performing a member access, and the
>> cv-qualifiers
>>    // for the base object type.
>> -  Results.setObjectTypeQualifiers(BaseType.getQualifiers());
>> +  Results.setObjectTypeQualifiers(BaseType.getQualifiers(), BaseKind);
>>
>>    // Access to a C/C++ class, struct, or union.
>>    Results.allowNestedNameSpecifiers();
>> @@ -4638,18 +4733,20 @@ void Sema::CodeCompleteMemberReferenceEx
>>      Base = ConvertedBase.get();
>>
>>      QualType BaseType = Base->getType();
>> +    ExprValueKind BaseKind = Base->getValueKind();
>>
>>      if (IsArrow) {
>> -      if (const PointerType *Ptr = BaseType->getAs<PointerType>())
>> +      if (const PointerType *Ptr = BaseType->getAs<PointerType>()) {
>>          BaseType = Ptr->getPointeeType();
>> -      else if (BaseType->isObjCObjectPointerType())
>> +        BaseKind = VK_LValue;
>> +      } else if (BaseType->isObjCObjectPointerType())
>>          /*Do nothing*/;
>>        else
>>          return false;
>>      }
>>
>>      if (const RecordType *Record = BaseType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
>> -      AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
>> +      AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
>> BaseKind,
>>                                          Record->getDecl(),
>>                                          std::move(AccessOpFixIt));
>>      } else if (const auto *TST =
>> @@ -4658,13 +4755,13 @@ void Sema::CodeCompleteMemberReferenceEx
>>        if (const auto *TD =
>>
>>  dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(TN.getAsTemplateDecl())) {
>>          CXXRecordDecl *RD = TD->getTemplatedDecl();
>> -        AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
>> RD,
>> -                                          std::move(AccessOpFixIt));
>> +        AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
>> BaseKind,
>> +                                          RD, std::move(AccessOpFixIt));
>>        }
>>      } else if (const auto *ICNT =
>> BaseType->getAs<InjectedClassNameType>()) {
>>        if (auto *RD = ICNT->getDecl())
>> -        AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
>> RD,
>> -                                          std::move(AccessOpFixIt));
>> +        AddRecordMembersCompletionResults(*this, Results, S, BaseType,
>> BaseKind,
>> +                                          RD, std::move(AccessOpFixIt));
>>      } else if (!IsArrow && BaseType->isObjCObjectPointerType()) {
>>        // Objective-C property reference.
>>        AddedPropertiesSet AddedProperties;
>>
>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeCompletion/member-access.cpp
>> URL:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeCompletion/member-access.cpp?rev=362785&r1=362784&r2=362785&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeCompletion/member-access.cpp (original)
>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeCompletion/member-access.cpp Fri Jun  7 02:45:17
>> 2019
>> @@ -210,3 +210,66 @@ void test3(const Proxy2 &p) {
>>  // CHECK-CC9: memfun2 (InBase) : [#void#][#Base3::#]memfun2(<#int#>)
>> (requires fix-it: {181:4-181:5} to "->")
>>  // CHECK-CC9: memfun3 : [#int#]memfun3(<#int#>) (requires fix-it:
>> {181:4-181:5} to "->")
>>  // CHECK-CC9: operator-> : [#Derived *#]operator->()[# const#]
>> +
>> +// These overload sets differ only by return type and this-qualifiers.
>> +// So for any given callsite, only one is available.
>> +struct Overloads {
>> +  double ConstOverload(char);
>> +  int ConstOverload(char) const;
>> +
>> +  int RefOverload(char) &;
>> +  double RefOverload(char) const&;
>> +  char RefOverload(char) &&;
>> +};
>> +void testLValue(Overloads& Ref) {
>> +  Ref.
>> +}
>> +void testConstLValue(const Overloads& ConstRef) {
>> +  ConstRef.
>> +}
>> +void testRValue() {
>> +  Overloads().
>> +}
>> +void testXValue(Overloads& X) {
>> +  static_cast<Overloads&&>(X).
>> +}
>> +
>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:225:7 %s -o - |
>> FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-LVALUE %s \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#int#]ConstOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#double#]RefOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#char#]RefOverload("
>> +// CHECK-LVALUE-DAG: [#double#]ConstOverload(
>> +// CHECK-LVALUE-DAG: [#int#]RefOverload(
>> +
>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:228:12 %s -o - |
>> FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CONSTLVALUE %s \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#double#]ConstOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#int#]RefOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#char#]RefOverload("
>> +// CHECK-CONSTLVALUE: [#int#]ConstOverload(
>> +// CHECK-CONSTLVALUE: [#double#]RefOverload(
>> +
>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:231:15 %s -o - |
>> FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PRVALUE %s \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#int#]ConstOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#int#]RefOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#double#]RefOverload("
>> +// CHECK-PRVALUE: [#double#]ConstOverload(
>> +// CHECK-PRVALUE: [#char#]RefOverload(
>> +
>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:234:31 %s -o - |
>> FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-XVALUE %s \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#int#]ConstOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#int#]RefOverload(" \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#double#]RefOverload("
>> +// CHECK-XVALUE: [#double#]ConstOverload(
>> +// CHECK-XVALUE: [#char#]RefOverload(
>> +
>> +void testOverloadOperator() {
>> +  struct S {
>> +    char operator=(int) const;
>> +    int operator=(int);
>> +  } s;
>> +  return s.
>> +}
>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:270:12 %s -o - |
>> FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-OPER %s \
>> +// RUN: --implicit-check-not="[#char#]operator=("
>> +// CHECK-OPER: [#int#]operator=(
>> +
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to