chandlerc added a comment. I understand the change to explicitly say `-O2`. I also understand the change to add an explicit `-fno-experimental-new-pass-manager` to a `RUN` line when we have another `RUN` line that explicitly uses `-fexperiemntal-new-pass-manager`.
But for many of these cases, there is no new-PM `RUN` line in the test. If we're going to fix one `RUN` line to a particular pass manager, we should fix both IMO unless there is something quite odd about the IR being tested that makes the result of optimizinng be weirdly different between the two pass managers. That would be somewhat surprising, so I kinda want to know if we actually see that so often to understand what is causing this divergence. In general, Clang tests shouldn't be checking such complex optimizations that the differences between the pass managers really manifests..... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63156/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63156 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
