plotfi added a comment. In D60974#1565570 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974#1565570>, @bruno wrote:
> > I am currently working on the next part of clang interface stubs that will > > take the interface stubs per compilation unit and merge them into one text > > stub (which will be used by something like llvm-elfabi to generate a > > stubbed out ELF .so file). I was using llvm-nm, but there are cases where > > the symbol is present in the .o file but it is marked as HIDDEN and > > llvm-readelf was what I was using to determine if the symbol was in fact > > marked as hidden. In these cases, the linker will not emit the symbol in > > the final .so file but it still needs the symbol as part of linking. > > This is similar to using "llvm-bcanalyzer" to check for serialization stuff > from clang. We can't guarantee that to be available and adding a dep here > would be weird. One way to workaround that would be to have a %llvm-readelf > thing in lit and not run tests if not available (which also makes it > questionable if it's not always running, but better than nothing?). Another > option is to add a small clang tool that dumps what you need to check. I will take a look at this. Thanks @bruno Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
