rsmith added a comment. Can we implement all of DR253 instead? (That is, don't restrict this change to libstdc++'s types.) We don't have precise wording for DR253 yet, but do have the guidance that "if the implicit default constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
