MyDeveloperDay added a comment. I appreciate what you've done to make this patch less duplicated code..but now you've almost got to the point where being able to control it all via configuration.
I'm with @rdwampler I think you should be able to extend the include categories...and then this becomes a very powerful capability. There are many people who use clang-format for a "non" standard style source trees, and they might like to use such a capability themselves without having to inherit from NetBSD type. I agree it will be complex, but that is a good justification for adding hard coded a NetBSD style. ================ Comment at: lib/Format/Format.cpp:1905 + } + ///!!!!!! llvm::stable_sort(Indices, [&](unsigned LHSI, unsigned RHSI) { ---------------- remove Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits