rjmccall added a comment. In D62584#1585091 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62584#1585091>, @Anastasia wrote:
> In D62584#1583340 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62584#1583340>, @rjmccall wrote: > > > Oh, yes, it definitely can't be done to class types. I suppose we should > > just forget about it. > > > Ok, regarding address space qualifiers in template instantiation - is it > still ok that we ignore them here in this patch? I think ignoring them in templates rather than diagnosing is the right thing to do, since it means that reasonable things, e.g. template functions returning `T`, won't be erroneous if you instantiate `T = __global int` just like they wouldn't be with `T = const int`. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62584/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62584 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
