jfb added a comment. In D64666#1599524 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666#1599524>, @ziangwan wrote:
> In D64666#1598194 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666#1598194>, @jfb wrote: > > > Thanks, the update looks good. > > > > One thing I just noticed: if I have a codebase with > > `-Wimplicit-float-conversion` it seems like updating clang will > > automatically turn the two new warnings on, correct? That seems good, but > > also difficult to roll out because I can't turns off just the two new > > warnings. In other words, if I want to adopt a new clang and I had > > `-Wimplicit-float-conversion` then the only options I have are: fix all the > > new warnings (which might take time given how much code I have), or turn > > off *all* of `-Wimplicit-float-conversion`. I think it makes sense to force > > fixing all warnings for the warning that's always a problem > > `warn_impcast_integer_float_precision_constant`, but for > > `warn_impcast_integer_float_precision` it would be nice if there were a > > `-Wno-*` which disables only `warn_impcast_integer_float_precision` and > > nothing else. > > This would make it way easier to roll out a new clang. > > > Yes, you are right. I am thinking about making a new flag for the warning but > make "definitely lose" one default on. How about > `-Wimplicit-int-float-conversion`? SGTM. It can still be a sub-warning of `-Wimplicit-float-conversion`, I just want to make sure we can turn it off on its own. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64666 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
