paulkirth added a comment. In D65300#1601733 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65300#1601733>, @xbolva00 wrote:
> Nice work! Glad to hear you like it. > It would be nice if we also have “-fsuggest-expect” so we could fix perf > issues thanks to PGO counters even for non-PGO builds. What do you think? Supporting suggestions is something we're planning to do in the future. Non-PGO builds are even the main motivation. I wanted to get this logic correct first, and make sure that we're handling all the odd edge cases before making new suggestions. I feel like our approach is really straightforward, but some things in clang are spread out in surprising ways or have interactions I've been surprised to find. That said, if finding problematic usage is done correctly, then reversing the logic to make a suggestions about useful annotations should be pretty easy. I still need to give some thought to how to express the right balance between execution count and frequency when suggesting new annotations, so that the user won't be overwhelmed with suggestions. I'm not sure that branch weights by themselves are sufficient for that use-case, but we should be able to come up with something that behaves reasonably well without too much trouble. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65300/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65300 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
