jfb added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/UsersManual.rst:999-1000 +diagnostics contradict each other, users of :option:`-Weverything` therefore +often disable many diagnostics such as :option:`-Wno-c++98-compat` +:option:`-Wno-c++-compat`. + ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Would you care to propose a more exhaustive list of conflicting diagnostics? > (Perhaps in a follow-up patch.) I looked a bit and I'm worried that providing a list won't be particularly satisfying for people looking at this. I think it's better to have some warning, and let folks figure out what works for their particular situation. Here I'm assuming that they don't use C++98 and that seems reasonable, but figuring out what side of contradictions they're on doesn't seem like it'll work out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65706/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65706 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
