ABataev added a comment. In D65819#1617736 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65819#1617736>, @Hahnfeld wrote:
> Can you detail what "incorrect linking" means? AFAIK the additional sections > were just bloating the executable, but how do they affect correctness? > > Will this patch change the ability to consume a bundled object file without > calling the unbundler? Using known ELF tools on the produced object files was > an important design decision and IIRC was somewhat important for using build > systems that are unaware of the bundled format. It might produce a lot of "junk" sections and I saw that in some cases it may affect the code linking. There is a report from Itaru Kitayama and I found out that this oartial linking leads to the incorrectly working application. Seems to me, there is a problem with partial linking in LD in some cases. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65819/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65819 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
