dsanders added a comment. In D65919#1621477 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65919#1621477>, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> I think patch should be split at least on Clang-tidy check and results of its > run on LLVM code. Probably per-target patches is even better solution. I've split the LLVM changes out into D65962 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962>. I expect it will be split up further for commit purposes if nothing else but I've kept it in a single review for now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D65919/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D65919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
