NoQ added a comment. My idea here was that this new feature isn't going to be user-facing. We aren't promising to support all combinations of enabled-disabled-silenced-dependent-registercheckerhacks, but instead use the new feature when we know it'll do exactly what we want. It is going to be up to the user-facing UI to decide how to use this feature, but not up to the end-users who simply want to silence diagnostics.
> Here is a problem with your patch: How would you go about silencing > diagnostics for `osx.cocoa.RetainCount`? I suppose > `-analyzer-silence-checker=osx.cocoa.RetainCount`. The problem however, that > the checker tag associated with it refers to `osx.cocoa.RetainCountBase` > under the hood, so you'll need to silence that instead. From that point on, > any other checker that suffers from the same issue is also silenced, that was > not the intent. Hmm, sounds like we need to hack up a fix for the checker tag on the bug node, so that it was appropriate to the presumed (as opposed to actual) checker name(?) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
