sdmitriev added a comment.

In D64943#1633164 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64943#1633164>, @ABataev wrote:

> In D64943#1619958 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64943#1619958>, @sdmitriev wrote:
>
> > As I understand ‘atexit’ solution would be target dependent (‘__cxa_atexit’ 
> > on Linux and ‘atexit’ on Windows) whereas @llvm.global_ctors/dtors 
> > variables offer similar and platform neutral functionality 
> > (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#the-llvm-global-ctors-global-variable). 
> > Why do you think that ‘atexit’ is a better choice?
>
>
> Because it does not work on Windows, better to have portable solution, if 
> possible.


@vzakhari has already committed his fix for llvm.global_dtors 
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D66373), so I assume use of llvm.global_dtors in this 
patch would no longer cause problems on Windows.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64943/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64943



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to