Charusso added a comment. In D66593#1642253 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66593#1642253>, @Charusso wrote:
> Wow, it is great you could address every of the edge cases. Thanks you so > much! I believe only one problem left: we need to `return false` instead of > plain `return` in order to let the Analyzer model the function call. I could > fix it easily, thanks! Well, not really. I have tested out and there is no difference. Thanks for the fixes! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66593/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66593 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
