tlively added a comment. In D67020#1653403 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67020#1653403>, @aheejin wrote:
> Should we handle these too? > > - There seems to be a generic intrinsic for fused multiply-add: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d21a3e41a4cfd52e3c5c9341f0b5ce8a173198bf/llvm/include/llvm/Target/GenericOpcodes.td#L612-L619 > - There are FMA related nodes in ISDOpcode.h, such as > - > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1ea909270c6d9ad612a46c2a15c13acc4f6d623a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/ISDOpcodes.h#L332-L337 > - > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1ea909270c6d9ad612a46c2a15c13acc4f6d623a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/ISDOpcodes.h#L294 Yes, eventually. For now I want the FMA to be explicitly opt-in, and I don't care about the autovectorizer generating it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67020/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67020 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits