NoQ added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/DynamicTypeInfo.h:24
+  DynamicTypeInfo(QualType ty, bool CanBeSub = true)
+      : Ty(ty), CanBeASubClass(CanBeSub) {}
 
----------------
`Ty(Ty)` is the idiom here.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CastValueChecker.cpp:126
+
+  // If the casts have a common anchestor it could not be a succeeded downcast.
+  for (const auto &PreviousBase : PreviousRD->bases())
----------------
Counterexample:

```
struct A {};
struct B : A {};
struct C : A, B {};
```

Downcast from `C` to `B` should succeed, even though they have a common 
ancestor `A` (which has the same `CXXRecordDecl` but currently isn't the same 
object within `C`, but can be, if `B` declares `A` as a virtual base).


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CastValueChecker.cpp:174
+
+constexpr llvm::StringLiteral Vowels = "aeiou";
+
----------------
Omg lol nice. Did you try to figure out how do other people normally do it?


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67079/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67079



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to