> On 2016-Feb-10, at 19:10, Marshall Clow <mclow.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm hoping only a year or two (or three...)? > > As I pointed out to Eric on IRC, those files have had a "deprecation warning" > every time they are included ... since 2010.
Yes, anyone that has already transitioned to libc++ has no excuse. They should just stop using ext/hash_map. Unfortunately we also ship this: http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/libstdcxx/libstdcxx-104.1/include/c++/4.2.1/ext/hash_map ^ It doesn't have any such #warning. Keeping ext/hash_map around makes it easier to transition people over to libc++. How big a maintenance burden is it? Is there a way to reduce the burden? _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
