rsmith added a comment. In D68581#1701787 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68581#1701787>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I think this seems like reasonable behavior (for instance, we include the > location of a storage class specifier already), but I am curious if @rsmith > agrees. Yes, I do agree. Though please be careful about the case where the first attribute occurs after the first decl-specifier (`int __attribute__((...)) x;`). Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68581/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68581 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
