ffrankies added a comment. As per the previous discussion, the check has been moved into the `performance` module.
In D66564#1670640 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66564#1670640>, @lebedev.ri wrote: > I, too, don't believe this is FPGA specific; it should likely go into `misc-` > or even `performance-`. > The wording of the diags seems weird to me, it would be good to 1. add more > explanation to the docs and 2. reword the diags. Implemented the requested code refactoring changes, and reworded the diags to now say `accessing the fields in struct 'name' is inefficient due to padding/poor alignment;`. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66564/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66564 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
