tejohnson added a comment. In D69327#1719295 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69327#1719295>, @tejohnson wrote:
> I was just typing up a response similar to @steven_wu 's response... I don't > think clang should be in the business of caching the outputs of a prior clang > invocation, the build system should and usually does avoid re-executing if > the inputs have not changed. Note that this is very different from the > caching of objects LTO is doing - because those are not otherwise emitted at > all, the cache has to be built in. And also because even if some of the inputs of the link change, not all backend threads necessarily need to be re-executed and not all native (intermediate) objects will change. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69327/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69327 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
