ymandel marked an inline comment as done. ymandel added a comment. In D69613#1729703 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69613#1729703>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> I see. Some decoupling is desirable, I agree. Maybe move `StencilInterface` > and `Stencil` into a separate header that `RewriteRule` can depend on, and > then define the library of stencils in another header? This sounds good. I'll put together a (stacked) revision to do this. It seems worth doing separately given that it will involve a substantial to the RewriteRule library & tests. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69613/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69613 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
