rjmccall added a comment. In D68578#1737415 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68578#1737415>, @yaxunl wrote:
> In D68578#1737351 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68578#1737351>, @rjmccall wrote: > > > Distinguishing between multiple symbols associated with the same > > source-level declaration is the purpose of the GlobalDecl abstraction. > > > It seems GlobalDecl is just a wrapper for concrete Decl's It's a `Decl` plus a discriminator which is required for certain kinds of declaration. See e.g. `GlobalDecl(const CXXConstructorDecl *D, CXXCtorType Type)`. `GlobalDecl` asserts if you try to construct it using `GlobalDecl(FunctionDecl*)` with a constructor/destructor declaration; we could similarly make that forbid construction with a kernel and then require code to use a `GlobalDecl` constructor that passes down whether it's the kernel or the stub that's being requested. John. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68578/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68578 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
