dblaikie added a comment. The failure I am investigating from the original commit of this at Google probably isn't related to the assertion failure that caused the revert of this patch/being addressed by this recommit. So if you could hold off a bit while I try to help provide a reproduction or enough detail for you to investigate this other internal failure?
At the moment the details I have is that the resulting assembly has an unused label/basic block boundary that's resulting in a location 0 (an un-located instruction placed at the beginning of a basic block uses location zero so it doesn't flow from the previous BB). Hmm, maybe that's unrelated, though. I haven't quite nailed it down yet. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69970/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69970 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
