LegalizeAdulthood added a subscriber: LegalizeAdulthood.

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:512
@@ +511,3 @@
+<tr><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Stmt.html";>Stmt</a>&gt;</td><td
 class="name" onclick="toggle('addrLabelExpr0')"><a 
name="addrLabelExpr0Anchor">addrLabelExpr</a></td><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1AddrLabelExpr.html";>AddrLabelExpr</a>&gt;...</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="4" class="doc" id="addrLabelExpr0"><pre>Matches address of 
label statements (GNU extension).
+
----------------
Can we put `gnu` in the name of matchers that only match GNU extensions?

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:544
@@ +543,3 @@
+<tr><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Stmt.html";>Stmt</a>&gt;</td><td
 class="name" onclick="toggle('atomicExpr0')"><a 
name="atomicExpr0Anchor">atomicExpr</a></td><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1AtomicExpr.html";>AtomicExpr</a>&gt;...</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="4" class="doc" id="atomicExpr0"><pre>Matches atomic builtins.
+</pre></td></tr>
----------------
Please provide an example here.

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:549
@@ +548,3 @@
+<tr><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Stmt.html";>Stmt</a>&gt;</td><td
 class="name" onclick="toggle('binaryConditionalOperator0')"><a 
name="binaryConditionalOperator0Anchor">binaryConditionalOperator</a></td><td>Matcher&lt;<a
 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1BinaryConditionalOperator.html";>BinaryConditionalOperator</a>&gt;...</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="4" class="doc" id="binaryConditionalOperator0"><pre>Matches 
binary conditional operator expressions (GNU extension).
+
----------------
See above re: gnu specific extensions.  When I read the name of this matcher, I 
expected it to be matching `==`, `!=`, `<=`, etc.

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:1120
@@ +1119,3 @@
+<tr><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Stmt.html";>Stmt</a>&gt;</td><td
 class="name" onclick="toggle('opaqueValueExpr0')"><a 
name="opaqueValueExpr0Anchor">opaqueValueExpr</a></td><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1OpaqueValueExpr.html";>OpaqueValueExpr</a>&gt;...</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="4" class="doc" id="opaqueValueExpr0"><pre>Matches opaque 
value expressions.
+
----------------
The docs say that OpaqueValueExpr doesn't correspond to concrete syntax, so why 
would we have a matcher for it?

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:1140
@@ +1139,3 @@
+Given
+  template&lt;typename T&gt; class X { void f() { X x(*this); } };
+parenListExpr()
----------------
Can we have a simpler example?  For instance, I can't see that `ParenListExpr` 
has anything to do with templates.

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:1149
@@ +1148,3 @@
+
+Example: Matches __func__)
+  printf("%s", __func__);
----------------
Does it actually match the closing paren?

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:1175
@@ +1174,3 @@
+<tr><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Stmt.html";>Stmt</a>&gt;</td><td
 class="name" onclick="toggle('stmtExpr0')"><a 
name="stmtExpr0Anchor">stmtExpr</a></td><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1StmtExpr.html";>StmtExpr</a>&gt;...</td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="4" class="doc" id="stmtExpr0"><pre>Matches GNU statement 
expression.
+
----------------
Ditto re: gnu extension

================
Comment at: docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html:1752
@@ +1751,3 @@
+<tr><td>Matcher&lt;<a 
href="http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1CXXConstructExpr.html";>CXXConstructExpr</a>&gt;</td><td
 class="name" onclick="toggle('requiresZeroInitialization0')"><a 
name="requiresZeroInitialization0Anchor">requiresZeroInitialization</a></td><td></td></tr>
+<tr><td colspan="4" class="doc" id="requiresZeroInitialization0"><pre>Matches 
a constructor call expression which requires
+zero initialization.
----------------
Please provide an example.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17446



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to