baloghadamsoftware added a comment.

In D71001#1768880 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71001#1768880>, @gribozavr2 wrote:

> Is this a common problem? There's a lot of silly code we could try to find, 
> but if people don't actually write it, then we get all downsides of 
> maintenance without the benefits of the checker.


Oh yes, all our checkers are developed upon user request. They only request it 
if they find out their developers write such silly code. And this kind of bug 
is nasty to debug. (In case of addition less memory is available behind the 
pointer while the memory ahead of it is lost. In case of subtraction data 
before the pointer gets overwritten.)


Repository:
  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71001/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71001



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to