baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D71001#1768880 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71001#1768880>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> Is this a common problem? There's a lot of silly code we could try to find, > but if people don't actually write it, then we get all downsides of > maintenance without the benefits of the checker. Oh yes, all our checkers are developed upon user request. They only request it if they find out their developers write such silly code. And this kind of bug is nasty to debug. (In case of addition less memory is available behind the pointer while the memory ahead of it is lost. In case of subtraction data before the pointer gets overwritten.) Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71001/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71001 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits