modocache added a comment.

This seems like a outright improvement, but as mentioned above it would be nice 
to get @rsmith's take on it since I'm not an expert. Two nitpicks, though:

1. Could you please run clang-format on the lines you added/modified?
2. Could you apply these changes on top of the llvm-project monorepo? You can 
do so by using the "download raw diff" link on this page, and then running `git 
apply --directory=clang -p 0 D70219.diff` from within the monorepo. I tried 
just now to confirm the tests pass with this change (they do!), and that 
command was able to apply the patch cleanly for me.



================
Comment at: lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:568
+        ASTDiags, CI.getFileSystemOpts(), CI.getCodeGenOpts().DebugTypeExtRefs,
+        false, None, CaptureDiagsKind::None, false, false, 
CI.getHeaderSearchOpts().PrebuiltModuleFiles);
     if (!AST)
----------------
For example I think this line would change if clang-format were to be run on it.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70219/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70219



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to