tejohnson added a comment.
It seems reasonable to support this from LTO since it provides analogous
support to what is available via clang without LTO. @pcc what do you think?
I only just skimmed it for now, one question below.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/LTO/LTOBackend.cpp:335
+ .Case("bitcode", EmbedBitcodeKind::Embed_Bitcode)
+ .Case("marker", EmbedBitcodeKind::Embed_Marker)
+ .Default(~0U);
----------------
Does this value make any sense since CmdArgs is always empty below?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68213/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68213
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
