sammccall added a comment. In D71345#1783579 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345#1783579>, @nridge wrote:
> In D71345#1783092 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345#1783092>, @sammccall wrote: > > > (though personally I'd find it frustrating to have no way to target `b` in > > `a+b+c`). > > > (For completeness, there is a way to target `b` in `a+b+c`: by selecting `b` > (such that your selection range has length 1 rather than 0). Then, neither > `+` node will enclose the selection range, but the `b` node will.) Indeed, sorry - I meant that if we incorporated it into an LSP server, there'd be no way to target it in methods that take a position rather than a selection (go to defn, hover etc). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71345 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
