annita.zhang added a comment.

In D70157#1793280 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157#1793280>, @reames wrote:

> I've gone ahead and landed the patch so that we can iterate in tree.  See 
> commit 14fc20ca62821b5f85582bf76a467d412248c248 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG14fc20ca62821b5f85582bf76a467d412248c248>.
>
> I've also landed a couple of follow up patches to address issues which would 
> have otherwise required iteration on the review.  See commits 
> c148e2e2ef86f53391be459752511684424f331b 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc148e2e2ef86f53391be459752511684424f331b>, 
> 4024d49edc1598a6f8017df541147b38bf1e2818 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4024d49edc1598a6f8017df541147b38bf1e2818>, and 
> 8b725f0459eee468ed7f9935fba3278fcb4997b1 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG8b725f0459eee468ed7f9935fba3278fcb4997b1>.
>
> I still see some room for further cleanup (i.e. the fragment range scheme and 
> tests), but what's in is of reasonable quality.
>
> There's a couple follow up patches which are probably called for, but I think 
> we can work on these in parallel now.
>
> 1. We need to settle on assembler syntax.
> 2. We need a patch for the x86 MI to MC translation to mark regions unsafe to 
> pad.  (Probably best to separate from the above for the moment.)
> 3. We can incrementally add support for prefix padding.


Thanks for landing it! And happy holiday to all!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to