craig.topper marked an inline comment as done. craig.topper added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/complex-libcalls.c:115-118 +// NO__ERRNO-NOT: .conj +// NO__ERRNO-NOT: @conj +// HAS_ERRNO-NOT: .conj +// HAS_ERRNO-NOT: @conj ---------------- spatel wrote: > Could we use positive matches for "fneg" here rather than NOT lines? If so, > then do we need the new test file? All of the CHECK lines are in the declaration part of the file after the function body. They aren’t checking the call site code. I could add new functions for the conj calls and check them earlier? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72028/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72028 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
