george.burgess.iv updated this revision to Diff 49333. george.burgess.iv added a comment.
Rebased, and narrowed the scope of the patch a bit. http://reviews.llvm.org/D13704 Files: include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp test/CodeGen/overloadable.c test/Sema/overloadable.c test/Sema/pass-object-size.c
Index: test/Sema/pass-object-size.c =================================================================== --- test/Sema/pass-object-size.c +++ test/Sema/pass-object-size.c @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ void (*p)(void *) = NotOverloaded; //expected-error{{cannot take address of function 'NotOverloaded' because parameter 1 has pass_object_size attribute}} void (*p2)(void *) = &NotOverloaded; //expected-error{{cannot take address of function 'NotOverloaded' because parameter 1 has pass_object_size attribute}} - void (*p3)(void *) = IsOverloaded; //expected-error{{initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-6{{candidate address cannot be taken because parameter 1 has pass_object_size attribute}} expected-note@-5{{type mismatch}} - void (*p4)(void *) = &IsOverloaded; //expected-error{{initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-7{{candidate address cannot be taken because parameter 1 has pass_object_size attribute}} expected-note@-6{{type mismatch}} + void (*p3)(void *) = IsOverloaded; //expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-6{{candidate address cannot be taken because parameter 1 has pass_object_size attribute}} expected-note@-5{{type mismatch}} + void (*p4)(void *) = &IsOverloaded; //expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@-7{{candidate address cannot be taken because parameter 1 has pass_object_size attribute}} expected-note@-6{{type mismatch}} void (*p5)(char *) = IsOverloaded; void (*p6)(char *) = &IsOverloaded; Index: test/Sema/overloadable.c =================================================================== --- test/Sema/overloadable.c +++ test/Sema/overloadable.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -Wincompatible-pointer-types int var __attribute__((overloadable)); // expected-error{{'overloadable' attribute only applies to functions}} void params(void) __attribute__((overloadable(12))); // expected-error {{'overloadable' attribute takes no arguments}} @@ -99,3 +99,26 @@ unsigned char *c; multi_type(c); } + +// Ensure that we allow C-specific type conversions in C +void fn_type_conversions() { + void foo(void *c) __attribute__((overloadable)); + void foo(char *c) __attribute__((overloadable)); + void (*ptr1)(void *) = &foo; + void (*ptr2)(char *) = &foo; + void (*ambiguous)(int *) = &foo; // expected-error{{initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@105{{candidate function}} expected-note@106{{candidate function}} + void *vp_ambiguous = &foo; // expected-error{{initializing 'void *' with an expression of incompatible type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@105{{candidate function}} expected-note@106{{candidate function}} + + void (*specific1)(int *) = (void (*)(void *))&foo; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of type 'void (*)(void *)'}} + void *specific2 = (void (*)(void *))&foo; + + void disabled(void *c) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(0, ""))); + void disabled(int *c) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(c, ""))); + void disabled(char *c) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(1, "The function name lies."))); + // To be clear, these should all point to the last overload of 'disabled' + void (*dptr1)(char *c) = &disabled; + void (*dptr2)(void *c) = &disabled; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(void *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@115{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@116{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@117{{candidate function has type mismatch at 1st parameter (expected 'void *' but has 'char *')}} + void (*dptr3)(int *c) = &disabled; // expected-warning{{incompatible pointer types initializing 'void (*)(int *)' with an expression of type '<overloaded function type>'}} expected-note@115{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@116{{candidate function made ineligible by enable_if}} expected-note@117{{candidate function has type mismatch at 1st parameter (expected 'int *' but has 'char *')}} + + void *specific_disabled = &disabled; +} Index: test/CodeGen/overloadable.c =================================================================== --- test/CodeGen/overloadable.c +++ test/CodeGen/overloadable.c @@ -29,3 +29,33 @@ cdv = f(cdv); vv = f(vv); } + +// Ensuring that we pick the correct function for taking the address of an +// overload when conversions are involved. + +void addrof_many(int *a) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(0, ""))); +void addrof_many(void *a) __attribute__((overloadable)); +void addrof_many(char *a) __attribute__((overloadable)); + +void addrof_single(int *a) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(0, ""))); +void addrof_single(char *a) __attribute__((overloadable, enable_if(0, ""))); +void addrof_single(char *a) __attribute__((overloadable)); + +// CHECK-LABEL: define void @foo +void foo() { + // CHECK: store void (i8*)* @_Z11addrof_manyPc + void (*p1)(char *) = &addrof_many; + // CHECK: store void (i8*)* @_Z11addrof_manyPv + void (*p2)(void *) = &addrof_many; + // CHECK: void (i8*)* @_Z11addrof_manyPc + void *vp1 = (void (*)(char *)) & addrof_many; + // CHECK: void (i8*)* @_Z11addrof_manyPv + void *vp2 = (void (*)(void *)) & addrof_many; + + // CHECK: store void (i8*)* @_Z13addrof_singlePc + void (*p3)(char *) = &addrof_single; + // CHECK: @_Z13addrof_singlePc + void (*p4)(int *) = &addrof_single; + // CHECK: @_Z13addrof_singlePc + void *vp3 = &addrof_single; +} Index: lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp +++ lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp @@ -8484,7 +8484,7 @@ // Cand1's first N enable_if attributes have precisely the same conditions as // Cand2's first N enable_if attributes (where N = the number of enable_if // attributes on Cand2), and Cand1 has more than N enable_if attributes. -static bool hasBetterEnableIfAttrs(Sema &S, const FunctionDecl *Cand1, +static bool hasBetterEnableIfAttrs(const Sema &S, const FunctionDecl *Cand1, const FunctionDecl *Cand2) { // FIXME: The next several lines are just @@ -10292,13 +10292,25 @@ bool hasComplained() const { return HasComplained; } private: - // Is A considered a better overload candidate for the desired type than B? + bool candidateHasExactlyCorrectType(const FunctionDecl *FD) { + QualType Discard; + return Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(TargetFunctionType, FD->getType()) || + S.IsNoReturnConversion(FD->getType(), TargetFunctionType, Discard); + } + + /// \return true if A is considered a better overload candidate for the + /// desired type than B. bool isBetterCandidate(const FunctionDecl *A, const FunctionDecl *B) { - return hasBetterEnableIfAttrs(S, A, B); + // If A doesn't have exactly the correct type, we don't want to classify it + // as "better" than anything else. This way, the user is required to + // disambiguate for us if there are multiple candidates and no exact match. + return candidateHasExactlyCorrectType(A) && + (!candidateHasExactlyCorrectType(B) || + hasBetterEnableIfAttrs(S, A, B)); } - // Returns true if we've eliminated any (read: all but one) candidates, false - // otherwise. + /// \return true if we were able to eliminate all but one overload candidate, + /// false otherwise. bool eliminiateSuboptimalOverloadCandidates() { // Same algorithm as overload resolution -- one pass to pick the "best", // another pass to be sure that nothing is better than the best. @@ -10411,12 +10423,9 @@ if (!S.checkAddressOfFunctionIsAvailable(FunDecl)) return false; - QualType ResultTy; - if (Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(TargetFunctionType, - FunDecl->getType()) || - S.IsNoReturnConversion(FunDecl->getType(), TargetFunctionType, - ResultTy) || - (!S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && TargetType->isVoidPointerType())) { + // If we're in C, we need to support types that aren't exactly identical. + if (!S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus || + candidateHasExactlyCorrectType(FunDecl)) { Matches.push_back(std::make_pair( CurAccessFunPair, cast<FunctionDecl>(FunDecl->getCanonicalDecl()))); FoundNonTemplateFunction = true; Index: include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td =================================================================== --- include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td +++ include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td @@ -260,6 +260,29 @@ not ODR-equivalent. Query for this feature with ``__has_attribute(enable_if)``. + +Note that functions with one or more ``enable_if`` attributes may not have +their address taken, unless all of the conditions specified by said +``enable_if`` are constants that evaluate to ``true``. For example: + +.. code-block:: c + + const int TrueConstant = 1; + const int FalseConstant = 0; + int f(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a > 0, ""))); + int g(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a == 0 || a != 0, ""))); + int h(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(1, ""))); + int i(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(TrueConstant, ""))); + int j(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(FalseConstant, ""))); + + void fn() { + int (*ptr)(int); + ptr = &f; // error: 'a > 0' is not always true + ptr = &g; // error: 'a == 0 || a != 0' is not a truthy constant + ptr = &h; // OK -- 1 is a truthy constant + ptr = &i; // OK -- 'TrueConstant' is a truthy constant + ptr = &j; // error: 'FalseConstant' is a constant, but not truthy + } }]; }
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits