logan-5 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-unintended-adl.rst:35 + + If non-zero, ignores calls to overloaded operators using the operator syntax (e.g. `a + b`), but not the function call syntax (e.g. `operator+(a, b)`). Default is `1`. + ---------------- Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > Indentation. Please use double back-ticks for a + b and operator+(a, b). I'm not sure what you would like me to change about the indentation. This follows the same format (three spaces) I've found in the documentation for other checks. ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-unintended-adl.rst:39 + + Semicolon-separated list of names that the check ignores. Default is `swap`. ---------------- Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > Indentation. Please use double back-ticks for swap (or std::swap?). Since the 'swap' here is referring to the default value of the option string, shouldn't it just be single backticks? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72282/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72282 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
