thakis added a subscriber: thakis. thakis added a comment. Instead of doing this, would it make sense to have a flag like -ffile-basename that changes what __FILE__ expands to?
I had wished I'd be able to have some control over __FILE__ (I'd like to say "make all __FILE__s relative to this given directory for my use case), and changing __FILE__ to something else in all the world's code isn't easy – so maybe having a flag that provides some control over __FILE__ instead of adding a separate macro would be a good idea. http://reviews.llvm.org/D17741 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
