not_ubsan was added a long time ago, I presume it is still needed due to recursion in sema as well. not_asan was added recently to 2 tests after r260760. I tentatively removed it from 'index-many-call-ops.cpp’ and if all looks good I’ll remove from the other as well.
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the test shouldn't require large stack usage, should the not_ubsan, > not_asan tags be removed? > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Works! Thank you for fixing this, and so quickly. >> >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Try with r262290. >>> >>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ah, I see the problem in the code, will fix shortly. >>>> >>>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> How are you configuring >>>>> >>>>> cmake -G "Ninja" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang >>>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On >>>>> -DLLVM_ENABLE_SPHINX=true -DSPHINX_OUTPUT_MAN=true ../llvm >>>>> >>>>>> and what compiler and version are you using ? >>>>> >>>>> $ clang --version >>>>> Ubuntu clang version 3.5.0-4ubuntu2~trusty2 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) >>>>> (based on LLVM 3.5.0) >>>>> Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu >>>>> Thread model: posix >>>>> >>>>> I do not see the stack overflow or segfault in debug builds. I do see >>>>> it regardless of whether or not I enable assertions. I also do not >>>>> see the stack overflow in a release build if I reduce the amount of >>>>> nesting in the test to about 2/3 of its present value. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I don’t quite understand how it gets that stack trace, >>>>>> dataTraverseNode() was introduced to avoid exactly this. >>>>>> How are you configuring and what compiler and version are you using ? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this still an issue after r260785 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just sync'ed to r262268 and was able to reproduce the segfault. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you provide a stack trace ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $ gdb --args release/bin/c-index-test -index-file >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm/src/tools/clang/test/Index/index-many-call-ops.cpp >>>>>>> (gdb) run >>>>>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>>>>> [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff2ca2700 (LWP 3936)] >>>>>>> 0x00007ffff4f264be in >>>>>>> clang::DeclarationName::print(llvm::raw_ostream&, >>>>>>> clang::PrintingPolicy const&) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> (gdb) bt >>>>>>> #0 0x00007ffff4f264be in >>>>>>> clang::DeclarationName::print(llvm::raw_ostream&, >>>>>>> clang::PrintingPolicy const&) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #1 0x00007ffff4f26c9e in clang::operator<<(llvm::raw_ostream&, >>>>>>> clang::DeclarationName) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #2 0x00007ffff4ebcb91 in >>>>>>> clang::cxindex::CXIndexDataConsumer::getEntityInfo(clang::NamedDecl >>>>>>> const*, clang::cxindex::EntityInfo&, clang::cxindex::ScratchAlloc&) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #3 0x00007ffff4ebc206 in >>>>>>> clang::cxindex::CXIndexDataConsumer::handleReference(clang::NamedDecl >>>>>>> const*, clang::SourceLocation, CXCursor, clang::NamedDecl const*, >>>>>>> clang::DeclContext const*, clang::Expr const*, CXIdxEntityRefKind) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #4 0x00007ffff4ebbae2 in >>>>>>> clang::cxindex::CXIndexDataConsumer::handleDeclOccurence(clang::Decl >>>>>>> const*, unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::index::SymbolRelation>, >>>>>>> clang::FileID, unsigned int, >>>>>>> clang::index::IndexDataConsumer::ASTNodeInfo) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #5 0x00007ffff51a05c5 in >>>>>>> clang::index::IndexingContext::handleDeclOccurrence(clang::Decl >>>>>>> const*, clang::SourceLocation, bool, clang::Decl const*, unsigned int, >>>>>>> llvm::ArrayRef<clang::index::SymbolRelation>, clang::Expr const*, >>>>>>> clang::Decl const*, clang::DeclContext const*) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #6 0x00007ffff51a092a in >>>>>>> clang::index::IndexingContext::handleReference(clang::NamedDecl >>>>>>> const*, clang::SourceLocation, clang::NamedDecl const*, >>>>>>> clang::DeclContext const*, unsigned int, >>>>>>> llvm::ArrayRef<clang::index::SymbolRelation>, clang::Expr const*, >>>>>>> clang::Decl const*) () >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #7 0x00007ffff51a9256 in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #8 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #9 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #10 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #11 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #12 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #13 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #14 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #15 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #16 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #17 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #18 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #19 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #20 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #21 0x00007ffff51a880e in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::dataTraverseNode(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> #22 0x00007ffff51a60dd in clang::RecursiveASTVisitor<(anonymous >>>>>>> namespace)::BodyIndexer>::TraverseStmt(clang::Stmt*, >>>>>>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::PointerIntPair<clang::Stmt*, 1u, bool, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*>, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<clang::Stmt*, 1u, >>>>>>> llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<clang::Stmt*> > > >*) () from >>>>>>> /usr/local/google/home/jlebar/code/llvm-complete/release/bin/../lib/libclang.so.3.9 >>>>>>> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Is this still an issue after r260785 ? >>>>>>>> Could you provide a stack trace ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, I think this broke clang/test/Index/index-many-call-ops.cpp. I >>>>>>>>> get a segfault due to recursive stack overflow in release builds on my >>>>>>>>> linux x86-64 box when running that test -- it seems the purpose of >>>>>>>>> that test is to check that we *don't* segfault. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This has been broken for a while, and people don't seem to be >>>>>>>>> complaining -- I'm not sure if there's something specific about my >>>>>>>>> config or if I'm just the first person to bother bisecting this... >>>>>>>>> Maybe the test just needs to be pared down some? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please advise. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> -Justin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I guess refreshing the build directory fixed the bots now. >>>>>>>>>> You may want to look into ccache as possibly the issue here. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> clangIndex library is not part of that command so I don’t >>>>>>>>>>> understand how my changes affect linking the clang binary, >>>>>>>>>>> clangIndex is only used for libclang. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I looked at it but it wasn’t clear to me what the problem >>>>>>>>>>>> is: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FAILED: : <lond command> >>>>>>>>>>>> /home/linaro/buildbot/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/stage1/tools/clang/clang.order: >>>>>>>>>>>> file not recognized: File truncated >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I thought it was some build SNAFU, do you have some hint on what I >>>>>>>>>>>> need to do to fix this ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Renato Golin >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 February 2016 at 23:11, Argyrios Kyrtzidis via cfe-commits >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: akirtzidis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Feb 12 17:10:59 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> New Revision: 260760 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=260760&view=rev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Log: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [libclang] Separate the underlying indexing functionality of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> libclang and introduce it into the clangIndex library. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a general goodness for libclang itself to mostly be a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrapper of functionality provided by the libraries. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This broke both ARM builds: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/9853 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15/builds/9806 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's still broken. I'm going to refresh the build directory, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>> please keep an eye or revert if that doesn't work. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> --renato >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
