rsmith added a comment.

In D67678#1834542 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678#1834542>, @steven_wu wrote:

> @rsmith This also breaks macOS SDK. Can we revert this as we discuss a less 
> aggressive option?


(This was already reverted a couple of days ago.)

Do you have a timeline for how long it would take to fix the MacOS SDK? Is this 
something we could realistically aim to do in Clang 11 instead? I would really 
prefer for us to not have different defaults for Darwin versus everywhere else, 
so if waiting one release cycle is enough, that seems fine.

I'll split out the new flag at least and re-land for Clang 10, while we figure 
out how to set the default.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to