russell.gallop added a comment. In D73162#1834379 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73162#1834379>, @asbirlea wrote:
> Oh, wow! Might I ask you add the same for fmul? We may get a revision like > that next time :). > Thank you! fmul shouldn't have the same problem as git hashes are only hex characters. In D73162#1834392 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73162#1834392>, @fhahn wrote: > I think we could also just add a single match for something after the > generated functions, to limit the scope of CHECK-NOT, e.g add something like > `CHECK : !0 =` Thanks, that's cleaner. Note that the diff here is a little confused. There are now no changes to the previous check lines. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73162/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73162 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
