akyrtzi added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17820#366638, @milianw wrote:
> But, we currently always request code completion at a word start boundary so > nothing would change for us. That said, I see how this patch could be seen as > a breaking behavior change, and thus should probably only get enabled by an > explicit option - if at all. I actually think it is fine changing it so clang code-completion automatically adjusts to word boundary, I cannot think of a case where it is useful to not do that, or being aware of a client that does not already adjusts anyway. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D17820 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
