xazax.hun added a comment. In D73376#1839818 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D73376#1839818>, @NoQ wrote:
> I don't see any immediate solutions to the boilerplate that don't consist in > introducing better checker APIs. Eg., we could have introduced a > `LazyBugType` - a wrapper around `Optional<BugType>` that'd take description > immediately but create the actual bug type only once the checker name is > known, or we could make a `MultiCallDescriptionMap` that'd prevent us from > both splitting up the map and writing down an extra piece of information on > every line. Those would be very welcome additions. Although these are more likely to be useful for advanced users and not help with writing one's first checker, so I guess this remains to be nice to have :) > You mean `PthreadLockBase`? I think that's how @Szelethus intended to have > such checker hierarchies to work. Yay! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73376/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73376 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
