aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-qualified-auto.rst:41 + auto *const Bar = cast<const int *>(Baz2); + auto *volatile FooBar = cast<int *>(Baz3); + ---------------- njames93 wrote: > Quuxplusone wrote: > > Is it worth adding an example of a double pointer? > > > > auto BarN = cast<int **>(FooN); > > > > Does that become `auto*` or `auto**` (and why)? My wild guess is that it > > becomes `auto*` (and because nobody cares about double pointers), but I > > could be wrong. > Double pointers are just resolved to `auto *`. They resolve to `auto *` today but I could see a real argument that they should resolve to `auto **` instead based on the same logic of: don't make the reader infer pointer/references and qualifiers. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D73548/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D73548 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
