NoQ added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/misc-no-recursion.cpp:153 +// CHECK-NOTES: :[[@LINE-7]]:3: note: Frame #1: function 'boo' calls function 'bar' here: +// CHECK-NOTES: :[[@LINE-14]]:18: note: Frame #2: function 'bar' calls function 'boo' here: +// CHECK-NOTES: :[[@LINE-15]]:18: note: ... which was the starting point of this call graph ---------------- Aha, yeah, the warning is present, i guess that part is correct, but look how your note `function 'bar' calls function 'boo' here:` doesn't really point into the body of 'bar'. In this case it still makes sense because it's easy to see that 'foo' is called from 'bar', but the chain of default arguments may be arbitrarily long (what if 'boo' has yet another default argument?). You might want to add a separate facility just to handle this edge case. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
