aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/warn-strict-prototypes.c:11
+// function definition with 0 params, no prototype.
+void foo1() {} // expected-warning {{this old-style function definition is not 
preceded by a prototype}}
+// function definition with 0 params, prototype.
----------------
aaronpuchert wrote:
> aaronpuchert wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > I'd like a few more test cases:
> > > ```
> > > // Test that a non-prototyped definition with no preceding prototype 
> > > whines about lacking a preceding prototype
> > > void fooN() {} // expected-warning {{this old-style function definition 
> > > is not preceded by a prototype}}
> > > 
> > > // Test that an existing declaration with no prototype still warns that a 
> > > corresponding definition with a type list is still not preceded by a 
> > > prototype.
> > > void fooN1(); // expected-warning {{this function declaration is not a 
> > > prototype}}
> > > void fooN1(void) {} // expected-warning {{this old-style function 
> > > definition is not preceded by a prototype}}
> > > ```
> > I guess we want the warning only on the declaration of `fooN1`, not the 
> > definition? Because that's not an old-style function definition.
> Yeah, I'm not sure about `fooN1`. We can't emit the warning on the definition 
> (and I think we also don't need to, as we diagnose that before), and the 
> warning on the declaration is kind of tested already. (Note that there is 
> also `-Wmissing-prototypes`.)
> 
> But `fooN` definitely makes sense, I'll add that.
I think you're right about the `fooN1` definition not needing a warning -- I 
was thinking we wanted to warn because there was no preceding prototype, but 
it's not an old-style declaration at that definition. You can ignore that 
suggestion.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to