andrew.w.kaylor added a comment. In D74436#1875315 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D74436#1875315>, @nemanjai wrote:
> > You're right, -O0 shouldn't generate FMA. I'm preparing to revert this now > > -- just verifying the build. > > Perhaps this should be > `off` with no optimization > `on` with `-O1/-O2/-O3/-Os/-Oz` > `fast` with fast math > > Just a suggestion, I'm not sure whether that would be the best breakdown. > Perhaps we can also see what the defaults are for GCC and unify with those? GCC doesn't support "on" so I'm not sure it's possible to distinguish their intentions. I think it would be better to define what we think is best for clang and encourage GCC to unify with that. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74436/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74436 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
