njames93 marked an inline comment as done.
njames93 added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/utils/Matchers.h:53-55
+ast_matchers::internal::Matcher<NamedDecl>
+hasAnyListedName(std::vector<std::string> Names);
+
----------------
alexfh wrote:
> We could change all checks to use the other overload and drop this one (and 
> the utils::options::parseStringList() call in each check's constructor). WDYT?
I'm not sold on that, I'd like the conventions of all checks to be the same wrt 
option lists, however those option lists aren't only used for names of decls.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D75911/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D75911



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to