Quuxplusone added a comment. I still think this entire patch is misguided; there's no reason to make the note for `const std::string s; std::move(s)` any longer than the note for `int i; std::move(i)` or `volatile std::string v; std::move(v)`. People should not be using moved-from objects, period; and those who want to use moved-from objects, should not enable this clang-tidy check.
However, I have no further comments //besides// philosophical opposition to the whole idea. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74692/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74692 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
