rjmccall added a comment. I guess the logical rule would be that the bit-width of the size has to match the minimum of the bit-widths of the address spaces used with the intrinsic. (Note that `llvm.memcpy` etc. can take pointers into two different address spaces, potentially of different widths.) That might be pretty disruptive for existing code, though.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76283/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76283 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
